Notes:
Characteristics of unplanned speech
·
Non
fluency features – fillers, hesitations, interruptions
·
Usually
informal register
·
Often
some phatic talk
·
Sometimes
there is non-standard English/grammar
·
Deictic
expressions
·
Spontaneous
·
Overlaps
Characteristics of semi-planned
speech
·
Often
follows an order
·
Lots
of questions
·
More
formal register
·
More
standard English/grammar
·
Some
phatic talk
Characteristics of planned speech
·
More
fluent
·
Formal
register
·
Standard
grammar
·
Less
phatic talk
·
Words
are carefully chosen
We want to
make contact with others – even if it's only to say ‘hello'. These are known as
phatic utterances.
We want to
exchange ideas and social information with friends. These are interactional exchanges.
We want to express
how we feel. These are expressive
utterances.
We want to
provide information. These are referential
utterances.
We want to
get something done. These are transactional
exchanges.
Permanence – a conversation is not usually
recorded so it only remains in the memory of the people in the conversation. If
something is written then it can be re-read as long as the writing exists.
Expressing feelings – e.g. facial expressions, tones of
voice, body language to convey feelings. Writing relies on expressive words,
punctuation and graphological features to convey feelings.
A moment in time –talking to someone happens during a
particular time period, it is immediate. When something is read, you may not
have been present when the writing was produced.
Context –where the conversation takes place
in a particular situation where all the participants are aware of who is
talking and about what. In writing, it needs to be explained more precisely of
who or what it is referring to.
Interaction – speech is active, writing is
different – can be second person.
Typical features of a news script
·
Planned
and rehearsed
·
Formal/informal
contradictions to relate to the audience
·
Emphasis
on key words adds variety and drama to the delivery
·
Almost
colloquial language adds to the effect that it is spoken rather than reading a
written text
Public speaking
·
Rhetorical
questions can be asked – reply not expected but usually obvious
·
Questions
can be asked and answered by the same person
·
Emotive
language – powerful with strong connotations
·
Outbursts
of emotion
·
Hyperbole
– over exaggeration
·
Repetition
·
Techniques
– metaphors, similes etc.
·
Emphasis
of trustworthiness
·
Don’t
trust others
The difference between interviews and
spontaneous speech
My answer: Interviews
are planned and have a formal register whereas spontaneous speech is more
informal with more non-fluency features.
Model
answer: In an interview situation the interviewer (e.g. TV chat show host, job
interviewer) already has an idea of what questions to ask and therefore is
largely in control of the topic and how the interaction proceeds. All parties
have an expectation of the pattern to be followed. The talk in this situation
is also likely to be characterised by a more formal register and fewer
interruptions and overlaps. In contrast, entirely unrehearsed and spontaneous
utterances or exchanges are likely to contain more non-fluency features such as
– fillers, hesitations, unvoiced pauses, false starts, repetitions, deictic
expressions and interruptions or overlaps in conversations.
Analysing spontaneous speech
My answer: This
speech is spontaneous and so has a lot of non-fluency features such as
hesitations, fillers and voiced pauses. It has an informal register and there
are some examples of phatic talk.
Model
answer: One thing that makes a lot of us uncomfortable about the answering
machine is that it makes our speech permanent (like writing) – and we can't rub
it out or take back our mistakes! We also find it disconcerting talking to
someone when they're not present – we want to sound friendly but don't get the
usual feedback we'd get in casual conversations. You may have noticed the
following in Jo's message: there's no response to the phatic ‘hello', making Jo
pause, lots of filled and unvoiced pauses while Jo thinks about what to say
next, some sections are more fluent – had Jo pre-planned these? And Jo ends
with the usual closure – even though Steve and Jan aren't there.
No comments:
Post a Comment